Longevity Lab ReportBeta

The Executive Playbook, Graded

What the paid executive health programs cost and include, what the evidence says about each part, and how to assemble the parts that matter yourself.

Longevity Lab Report. First edition. Prices and program contents checked October 18, 2026.

The short answer

Core executive health programs at named providers charge about $8,000 to $25,000 a year, with concierge tiers above that range.[1] For that money you get one accountable physician, a broad blood panel, body composition and bone measurement, cardiac imaging, guideline cancer screening, and an annual day where all of it happens at once, with a specialist down the hall if anything turns up.

The honest verdict: the parts of these programs with the strongest evidence behind them are also the cheapest parts, and most of them are available free or close to it. Measured fitness and the training that follows from it, coronary calcium scoring tied to lipid management, guideline cancer screening, metabolic labs, and DEXA body composition and bone measurement carry the evidence. The expensive detection layer stacked on top, whole-genome sequencing, annual whole-body MRI, and multi-cancer blood tests, is where the longevity-branded programs differentiate themselves, and it is where the outcome evidence is thinnest.

One line separates this market in two. The hospital programs (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cooper Clinic) sell guideline medicine, delivered efficiently, in a single day. The longevity-branded programs (Fountain Life, Human Longevity, Biograph) sell additional detection on top of the same guideline core.[1]

And the two most evidence-dense offerings in the entire set cost the least. Cooper Clinic's exam, reported from about $2,500, is built around a measured fitness test backed by fifty years of outcome data. Peter Attia's published protocol, the framework in his book Outlive, is free to read and mostly free to run. Everything above those two price points buys consolidation, speed, escalation, and accountability. It does not buy better evidence.

What the programs charge

Prices below are labeled the way we found them. Published means the operator states the price on its own site or shop. Reported means a named third-party source reported or estimated it, because the operator does not publish a consumer price. Dates are the dates we checked or the dates of the reporting.

ProgramWhat you payLabelChecked
Fountain Life BASE$595/yr (Florida and Texas only): 100+ blood biomarkers, DEXA, clinician-led review, 12 months of its appPublishedOct 14, 2026
Fountain Life CORE$10,500/yr: the annual diagnostic battery (full-body and brain MRI, AI coronary CT scan, DEXA, full labs), one physician reviewPublishedOct 14, 2026
Fountain Life APEX$23,500/yr: CORE plus quarterly blood panels and coach reviews, multi-cancer blood test, genome sequencing in year one, epigenetic age test, a named concierge physician, access to its therapeutics menuPublishedOct 14, 2026
Human Longevity Genomics$599 one-time: clinical whole-genome sequencing, pharmacogenomics, disease-risk and carrier reporting, annual re-analysisPublishedOct 18, 2026
Human Longevity Executive Health$8,000/yr: one private day, genome plus whole-body and brain MRI, DEXA, coronary calcium score, echocardiogram, 120+ blood biomarkers (the company also describes the panel as “hundreds”)PublishedOct 18, 2026
Human Longevity 100+ Care$12,000/yr: Executive Health plus continuous glucose monitor, cardiac rhythm patch, Cologuard, cardiac MRI, five physician touchpoints across the yearPublishedOct 18, 2026
Human Longevity 100+ Concierge$19,000/yr: 100+ Care plus the GRAIL Galleri multi-cancer test, MRI body composition, subspecialty and Mass General consults, concierge primary carePublishedOct 18, 2026
Biograph Core$7,500/yr: 20+ assessments in one evaluation day, initial guidancePublished at launchFeb 27, 2025
Biograph Black$17,500/yr (launched at $15,000 in February 2025; a later company email priced it $14,500): 30+ assessments (1,000+ data points), ongoing testing, health coaching, specialist referralsPublishedOct 18, 2026
Attia's practice (Early Medical)Six figures a year. Attia's own words on 60 Minutes: “much closer to $100,000 than $500,000.” Fewer than 75 patients. No published feeReported, from Attia himselfOct 26, 2025
Attia's published protocol (Outlive)Free: the book and the podcast. An optional online course condenses itPublished2023
Mayo Clinic Executive HealthAbout $5,000 to $11,000 for a 1 to 3 day program (MediHorizon's 2026 estimate), depending on imaging and genetic add-ons. Mayo publishes no current consumer rate card; its last published protocol sheet (2015) listed $2,200 to $3,000 for the standard programReported estimates2026
Cleveland Clinic Executive HealthStarts at about $3,000; typical reported range $3,000 to $7,000 for the single-day evaluation; premium cardiovascular-focused packages have been reported as high as $25,000 (MediHorizon)Reported2025 to 2026
Cooper Clinic preventive examReported from about $2,500 for the one-day exam (Concierge Medicine Today; about eight hours, same-day results). Cooper does not publish exam pricingReported2026

Fountain Life's top tier keeps getting more expensive. APEX has carried three price points in under two years: $19,500 in February 2025, $21,500 in July 2025, and $23,500 in October 2026. That is roughly $2,000 a year of price drift on the flagship tier, and it is the best-documented price history in this market: the current price is published, and each earlier point is on the record through reporting (Keep Health for the $19,500 point in February 2025, Bloomberg via FoundersToday for the $21,500 point in July 2025).

Half this market does not publish prices at all. Human Longevity, Fountain Life, and Biograph publish ladders. Mayo, Cleveland Clinic, and Cooper Clinic do not, and Attia's practice has no published fee at all. Where a price in this piece is labeled reported, treat it as a planning figure, not a quote.

[1] Hospital-based programs (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cooper Clinic) sell fee-for-service exams rather than annual memberships, and their prices fall below the membership range in the headline. Their figures are reported, not published. Range and footnote checked October 18, 2026.

What is inside, graded component by component

Six programs, one union of components. Eight components appear in at least five of the six: a dedicated physician who owns the day, a broad blood panel, DEXA body composition and bone measurement, cardiac imaging, guideline cancer screening, nutrition and exercise counseling, same-system specialist escalation, and an annual cadence with results compared year over year.

The table below grades the components, not the brands. It has 20 rows: 7 sit among the strongest evidence in the set, 4 in the middle of the table, and 9 among the weakest. A note on how to read the evidence column: the screening grades in this table are built from the underlying studies, protocol grades are still being built, and rows awaiting a graded record say so. Where the research behind this piece placed a component among the strongest or weakest in the set, the table says that in plain language. Five rows, the screening components, already carry letter grades from graded records: the calcium score, CCTA, and whole-body MRI rows link to their graded pages, and the DEXA and CGM rows carry their grades while their pages are built. The remaining rows say "Graded record in progress" until their records land.

The detection layer is not an abstraction: Cenegenics lists Cleerly AI CCTA and Prenuvo whole-body MRI among its own diagnostic partners, so two of the services graded in our screening review (CCTA with AI plaque analysis, C-; whole-body MRI, D+) are literally part of what paid programs sell.

Grades are research summaries, not medical advice. Decisions about your own stack belong with your clinician.

ComponentWho includes itThe evidence, plainlyGrade status
Strongest evidence in the set
Measured fitness test (maximal treadmill or VO2 max) with a structured exercise prescriptionCooper (its signature), Biograph, the Attia protocolStrongest evidence in the set. Measured cardiorespiratory fitness is among the strongest known predictors of all-cause mortality, and the prescription it generates, training, actually changes the number. In Cooper's own longitudinal data on more than 20,000 examinees, high-fit men had 69% lower heart-failure hospitalization risk and 44% lower heart-attack hospitalization risk than low-fit men. What the test measures: VO2 maxGraded record in progress
Guideline cancer screening (colonoscopy or stool-based colorectal screening, mammography, cervical screening, prostate discussion)At least five of the six (Mayo, Cleveland Clinic, Human Longevity, Cooper, the Attia protocol); absent from Fountain Life's and Biograph's published batteriesStrongest evidence in the set. The only screening family in these programs with randomized mortality evidence behind its core tests. Mayo builds its standard day around it; Human Longevity includes Cologuard at its 100+ Care tier; at Cleveland Clinic, mammography and Pap screening sit on the additional-cost, extended-stay list rather than inside the standard dayGraded record in progress
Low-dose CT lung screening for eligible smokersHuman Longevity; guideline-driven at the hospitalsStrongest evidence in the set. Mortality benefit proven in the population it is designed for: people with a significant smoking history. Everywhere else in this table, eligibility is what separates screening from fishingGraded record in progress
Coronary artery calcium scoring, tied to lipid management including apoBHuman Longevity, Cleveland Clinic, Cooper Clinic (Fountain Life and Biograph image the coronaries with CT angiography instead; see the CCTA row)Strongest evidence in the set. A calcium score reclassifies risk in intermediate-risk adults and changes statin decisions. Paired with aggressive apoB lowering, it is where mainstream cardiology and the Attia protocol agree. Cardiac imaging in one form or the other, calcium scoring and/or coronary CT angiography, appears in at least five of the six programs. The marker it manages: apoB
Metabolic risk detection done properly (HbA1c and fasting glucose, accurate blood pressure, a diabetes-prevention path)All six, inside the broad blood panelStrongest evidence in the set. Cheap, unglamorous, and connected to interventions with hard-outcome data. The blood panel earns its place because of rows like this one, not because of its sizeGraded record in progress
DEXA body composition and bone measurementFountain Life, Human Longevity, Mayo, Cleveland Clinic, BiographStrongest evidence in the set. The graded item is DEXA as a body-composition measurement tool: grade B, conditional on same-scanner, same-prep use. On one scanner its precision is class-leading, so a same-scanner trend shows whether a training or nutrition block actually changed fat and lean mass; a trend line that switches scanner brands measures the scanner change instead, and cross-brand numbers void the grade. The printed body-fat percentage carries individual error of roughly plus or minus 4 points against criterion models, which is what holds the grade at B. The bone-density measurement rides along in the same scan as the companion measurement, and that side carries the guideline support: it finds fracture risk while osteoporosis treatment still helps. Related record: DEXA lean mass
B
Medication and vaccination reviewMayo and Cleveland Clinic, explicitly; part of physician review elsewhereStrongest evidence in the set. Catches prescribing errors, interactions, and missed immunizations. No scan finds these. It costs almost nothing and almost nobody markets itGraded record in progress
Middle of the table
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA), including AI plaque analysisFountain Life, Biograph, Cleveland Clinic (add-on)Middle of the table. The evidence is strongest in symptomatic and intermediate-risk patients and thinner as a blanket screen of low-risk people. Radiation, contrast, and cost are real. This is a risk-stratification tool, not a screening entitlement
Continuous glucose monitoring in people without diabetesHuman Longevity 100+ Care; Attia practiceMiddle of the table. Produces interesting data and occasional behavior change. In our screening evidence review, CGM for people without diabetes grades C-: no randomized trial shows it improves any health outcome in this population, and a 2026 evidence review in JAMA Internal Medicine concluded there is no scientific evidence that CGM improves health or prevents disease in people without diabetes
C-
Pharmacogenomics (the drug-gene slice of genome sequencing)Human Longevity, from its $599 Genomics tierMiddle of the table, and the strongest slice of the genome product. Some drug-gene pairs carry real prescribing guidance. The wider disease-risk report around it is less actionable than the marketing suggestsGraded record in progress
Multi-cancer early detection blood tests (GRAIL Galleri)Human Longevity Concierge, Fountain Life APEX, Biograph Black; optional add-on at MayoMiddle of the table, and the row most likely to move. The technology is genuinely promising and outcome trials are running. As of October 2026 there is no completed randomized mortality evidence, and positive predictive value in screening studies is modest, so most positives are false alarms that require workupGraded record in progress
Weakest evidence in the set
Whole-body MRI as an annual blanket screenFountain Life, Human Longevity, Biograph; Cleveland Clinic as a paid add-on; Attia endorses it for himself with caveatsWeakest evidence in the set. Detection is real: Human Longevity's own published cohort of 1,190 adults found previously unknown cancers in about 1.7% and aneurysms in about 2.5%. No study shows the screening strategy improves outcomes, incidental findings are common, and follow-up cascades are the most predictable result. Attia's own warning, from 60 Minutes: the scan "is going to detect a lot of things that are not cancer... a lot of false positives. If you're not willing to go through that experience, as traumatic as it is, you should not engage in this level of screening"
Whole-genome sequencing as a screening productHuman Longevity (the front door), Fountain Life APEX (year one)Weakest evidence in the set as sold, with one strong slice. Human Longevity's cohort found medically significant variants in about 17% of adults, which is a genuine detection rate. The open question is how much of that changes management beyond what family history and standard care already catch. The pharmacogenomics slice above is the defensible partGraded record in progress
Epigenetic "biological age" scoresFountain Life APEXWeakest evidence in the set. A number with no validated intervention that follows from it, no outcome trial, and no agreed clinical meaning, sold as a headline result. The marker class itself: biological age clocksGraded record in progress
Consumer gut microbiome analysisFountain LifeWeakest evidence in the set. Produces reports, not clinical decisions. No standardized action follows from the resultGraded record in progress
Restorative biologics on a therapeutics menu (stem cell and exosome-type therapies)Fountain LifeWeakest evidence in the set. Unproven for longevity indications, sold on access. Fountain Life's own membership comparison flags some of these biologics as not FDA approved, and the regulatory exposure belongs to the memberGraded record in progress
Routine hormone "optimization" panels in people without symptoms (testosterone screening of all men)Cleveland Clinic standard batteryWeakest evidence in the set. Not a guideline-endorsed screen. In practice it functions mainly as an on-ramp to treatment of numbers rather than diseaseGraded record in progress
Total-body CT screening and beyond-calcium torso reviewCleveland Clinic (add-on), Cooper (dual-source CT torso review)Weakest evidence in the set. Radiology and preventive-medicine bodies advise against whole-body CT screening in asymptomatic people: radiation dose plus incidental findings, with no outcome benefit shownGraded record in progress
MRI-based body composition (AMRA) in place of DEXAHuman Longevity ConciergeWeakest evidence in the set. A more expensive ruler for a measurement DEXA already gives. The scan time costs more than the information is worthGraded record in progress
Homocysteine and omega-3 index panelsCooper standard blood workWeakest evidence in the set. Measured because they are measurable. Actionability is weak: the result rarely changes a decision. The markers: homocysteine, omega-3 indexGraded record in progress

How the programs sort, once the components are graded

Mayo's standard protocol is the most guideline-concordant menu in the set, and its restraint is the point: imaging is added by physician judgment, and the program itemizes its hospitality layer as a separate nonclinical fee rather than dressing it as medicine. Cleveland Clinic has the deepest cardiology bench: stress testing, calcium scoring, vascular screening, and retinal imaging inside the country's best-known heart program. Cooper is the control case for the whole category, founded in 1970, running the single-day model the startups later rebranded, and the only operator whose core metric carries its own fifty-year longitudinal dataset.

The longevity-branded three compete on detection volume. Fountain Life alone bundles access to interventions, prescriptions and its therapeutics menu, into the membership; everyone else primarily tests and advises. Human Longevity leads with the genome. Biograph, co-founded by Attia, sells his Outlive framework as a six-hour diagnostics day, and membership does not include being Attia's patient.

Company-reported detection rates, one caution. Human Longevity reports that its battery found actionable issues across its cohort, and Biograph's medical director has said roughly one in six members discovers something “urgent or life-alerting.” These are provider-published, uncontrolled figures. Detection is not the same as benefit: a finding only helps if acting on it early changes the outcome, and for the blanket-screening rows above, that second half is what the evidence has not yet shown.

The free version: the same core, assembled yourself

The graded core of every program above separates cleanly from the membership. Here is that core at three budget levels. Each level keeps the components from the strongest rows of the contents table and leaves the weakest rows out.

Grades are research summaries, not medical advice. Decisions about your own stack belong with your clinician.

Level 1: roughly $0 a year

This level is the Attia protocol, which is the most evidence-dense document in this piece and the only one that costs nothing.

  • Train like it is the prescription. Zone 2 aerobic work about 3 hours a week, one VO2 max interval session a week, strength training about 3 days a week, plus stability work. Attia frames this as training for the Centenarian Decathlon: pick the physical tasks you want to still do at 90, and train backward from them.
  • Eat for metabolic health. Protein at about 1 gram per pound of bodyweight per day, energy balance managed, no diet identity required.
  • Sleep about 8 hours, treated as an input to performance rather than what is left over.
  • Get the guideline screening done through your own physician. Colonoscopy from age 45 (Attia starts at 40), mammography and cervical screening on guideline schedules, vaccinations current. These carry the strongest evidence in the contents table and a standard physical already covers most of them.
  • Ask for apoB at your annual labs and treat the number as the lipid target that matters.

What this level skips: every detection add-on in the weakest rows. Nothing at this level requires a membership.

Level 2: a few hundred dollars a year

This level buys the measurements the free level cannot give you, bought one at a time. The items below are not all annual purchases: a DEXA and a calcium score are occasional buys rather than yearly ones, which is how the stack below stays inside a few hundred dollars a year when spread across a year.

  • Everything in Level 1, plus:
  • A DEXA scan for body composition and bone density, the graded body-composition measurement from the contents table, with guideline support behind the bone measurement.
  • A coronary calcium score if you are intermediate-risk and the result would change a statin decision. That condition is the evidence talking: the score earns its cost when it changes management.
  • A measured fitness test where available, so the training in Level 1 runs against a number instead of a guess.
  • The graded supplement basics, where a gap exists. Our ingredient grades: creatine (A-), vitamin D (B), omega-3 (B), magnesium (B-). Each grade links to the full record.

Two published shortcuts sit at this level for readers who would rather buy the bundle than assemble it. Fountain Life BASE, $595 a year in Florida and Texas, packages 100+ blood biomarkers, a DEXA, and a clinician-led review. Human Longevity's Genomics, $599 one-time, is the genome product on its own, pharmacogenomics included.

Level 3: a few thousand dollars a year

This level buys one consolidated day and one accountable physician, which is the honest core of what the memberships sell, at about a third of the entry membership price.

  • Everything in Levels 1 and 2, plus:
  • One executive exam day at a hospital program. Cooper Clinic's exam is reported from about $2,500 and is the strongest buy at this level: a maximal treadmill fitness test, coronary calcium scoring, dermatologist skin screening, full labs, and nutrition counseling, with results the same day. Cleveland Clinic's day is reported from about $3,000, with the deepest cardiology battery in the set.
  • The year-over-year habit. Whichever day you buy, repeat it annually and keep the results in one place. Longitudinal comparison is the retention logic of every paid program, and it works the same when you run it yourself.

What this level still skips: annual whole-body MRI, genome sequencing as a screen, multi-cancer blood tests, epigenetic age scores, and microbiome reports. The contents table explains why, row by row. If a future trial changes one of those verdicts, the graded record changes with it.

What the money buys that free cannot

The free version above is real, and it is most of the evidence. Here is what it does not include, stated as plainly as the grading.

Escalation inside one system. When a Mayo or Cleveland Clinic scan finds something, the specialist appointment happens inside the same institution, often inside the same visit window. When your self-assembled calcium score finds something, you book your own cardiology referral and wait. That gap, a finding becoming an appointment without the patient project-managing it, is the single most defensible thing the memberships sell.

One physician who owns the day and the follow-up. The common core starts with a dedicated physician for a reason. In the paid programs, one clinician holds your history, your results, and your action plan, and at the concierge tiers that clinician is reachable all year. Human Longevity's entry tier shows the boundary honestly: at $8,000, a longevity clinician reviews your results with you directly, with personalized insights and a clear action plan. What the tier does not include is Human Longevity managing what happens next: the ongoing follow-up and continuing management are what the tiers above it add.

Logistics and time. A 1 to 3 day itinerary, coordinated scheduling, results in a day or two, records kept and compared year over year. A self-assembled version of the same core takes separate appointments spread across months, and most people never finish assembling it. The membership is, in part, a payment against your own procrastination, and for the executives these programs target, that is not a trivial purchase.

Accountability. Quarterly blood panels with a coach review, a named coordinator, a re-test already on the calendar. The free protocol has the same training prescription and nobody checking whether Tuesday happened.

What the money does not buy is better evidence. The strongest components are identical in the free version and the $23,500 version, because evidence does not have a tier. The additional detection the top tiers sell may prove valuable as trials complete, and our grades will move if it does. Today, paying more buys more testing, more access, and more follow-through. It buys certainty of scheduling. It does not buy certainty of outcome.

Frequently asked questions

How much do executive health programs cost?

Core programs at named providers charge about $8,000 to $25,000 a year, with concierge tiers above that range. Hospital-based programs (Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Cooper Clinic) sell fee-for-service exams rather than memberships and price below the range; Cooper Clinic's exam is reported from about $2,500. Prices here are labeled published or reported, with check dates.

What do executive health programs include?

Eight components appear in at least five of the six programs: a dedicated physician who owns the day, a broad blood panel, DEXA body composition and bone measurement, cardiac imaging, guideline cancer screening, nutrition and exercise counseling, same-system specialist escalation, and an annual cadence with results compared year over year. The longevity-branded programs add a detection layer on top: whole-genome sequencing, annual whole-body MRI, and multi-cancer blood tests.

What grade does whole-body MRI get?

D+ in our screening review. Detection is real (about 1 to 2 confirmed cancers per 100 scanned), but no study shows the screening strategy improves outcomes, about 1 in 3 scans flag something, and 16% of findings are false positives that start follow-up the buyer pays for.

Can I assemble the same core for free?

Mostly, yes. The strongest-evidence components (measured fitness and training, coronary calcium scoring tied to lipid management, guideline cancer screening, metabolic labs, DEXA body composition and bone measurement) are available free or close to it; Peter Attia's published protocol assembles them at roughly $0 a year. What the money buys is consolidation, speed, in-system escalation, and accountability, not better evidence.

Method, and when this was last checked

How we built this. Every program above was researched from a minimum of three independent sources, including the program's own published material, in October 2026. Program contents are described from operator materials and named third-party reporting. Company-reported outcome and detection figures are labeled as company-reported wherever they appear.

Pricing discipline. A price prints as published only when the operator states it. Everything else prints as reported, with the source type and date, and reported figures are planning estimates rather than quotes. Prices in this market move: Fountain Life's top tier has moved three times in under two years. We re-verify every price and tier on a quarterly cycle, and the piece carries its check date so a stale figure is visible as stale.

Grading status. Letter grades in Longevity Lab Report attach to graded records: today, the ingredient library and the first screening records. Coronary calcium scoring (B), DEXA body composition (B), CCTA with AI plaque analysis (C-), CGM for people without diabetes (C-), and whole-body MRI (D+) are graded; the calcium score, CCTA, and whole-body MRI grades link to their screening pages from the contents table, and the DEXA and CGM grades render without links until their pages exist. The protocol grades behind the remaining rows are in progress and land as the underlying records are graded; when a row gains a grade, the row links to that record. Until then, rows carry the evidence assessment from the research itself, labeled as shown.

Last reviewed: October 18, 2026. First edition. What changed: initial publication.

One more thing, once a week. Every Thursday, Longevity Lab Report sends the week's longevity and biotech news: biotech news, expert moves, what is working, and new supplements and peptides, in plain English and linked to the grades. When a program above changes its price, or a grade in the contents table lands or moves, Thursday is where it is reported.

One email a week, every Thursday.

The week's longevity and biotech news, in plain English and linked to the grades.

The week's longevity and biotech news, graded against the evidence. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Every grade follows a published rubric, and sponsors never change one. When the evidence moves a grade, Thursday is where you hear it first, before you renew a stack that stopped earning its cost.